A Washington Update

Budget Battles — Round One
For the last several weeks, the focus of work and concern in Washington, DC, has been the passage of the fiscal year 2011 federal budget and the threat of a Federal government shutdown. With their backs against the wall, congressional leadership and President Obama cut a deal to finalize the budget for FY 2011, although there are only five months left in the current fiscal year. The next hurdle is the FY 2012 budget. And this too will be a dogfight, but the fight will be coupled with the battle over the extension of the country’s debt ceiling that needs to be raised by the middle of May or the nation technically goes into default.

On Thursday, April 14, the House passed HR 1473, the Department of Defense and Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act 2011, which keeps the government running through the end of September and cuts $38.5B in federal spending. The bill passed the House on a bipartisan 260-to-167 vote, with 179 Republicans and 81 Democrats voting in favor; 59 Republicans and 108 Democrats opposed the measure. The Senate passed it with a vote of 81 to 19 with 3 Democrats, 15 Republicans and 1 Independent voting against the bill. President Obama signed the budget bill on Friday, April 15, as the current continuing resolution expired and a shutdown was averted.

On Friday, April 15, the House passed the FY 2012 budget plan written by Congressman Paul Ryan (WI) who chairs the House Budget Committee. The vote was 235-193 with four Republicans voting with the Democrats. Next up is the Senate, but it is unlikely to pass this bill. Of note, this is not an appropriations bill but a blueprint usually drafted by the party in the majority in the House for the upcoming fiscal year and beyond. This year’s blueprint includes the House Republican strategy to reduce the budget deficit over the next several years.

The following is an initial summary of program cuts, eliminations, increases, and policy changes made to the FY 2011 budget. Until the U.S. Department of Education releases its table that shows the official interpretation of the continuing appropriation, the following numbers are subject to change and may not be complete.

The text has been posted on the House and Senate appropriations Websites. The Education section begins on page 325. Also, it should be noted that all programs are subject to a 0.2 percent across-the-board cut, which is not reflected in the numbers below.

Many programs were not spared the “budget ax” including some favorites of members of Congress and the administration. ESEA Title I and IDEA were not touched.

Program increases:
  • Race to The Top gets $700M. It appears these funds will go to states, not LEAs. It adds a new provision to the program by allowing funds to go to states for what essentially is the administration's Early Learning Challenge Fund (see pages 328-329)

  • Investing in Innovation gets $150M

  • Promise Neighborhoods gets a total of $30M ($20M increase)


Program cuts and eliminations (amount a program was cut and status):
  • ESEA evaluation -$1M
  • School Improvement Grants  -$10M

  • Striving Readers  -$250M (eliminated)

  • Even Start  -$66.5M (eliminated)

  • Literacy Through School Libraries -$19.1M (eliminated)

  • Education technology state grants -$100M (eliminated)

  • Arts in Education -$40M (eliminated)

  • Exchanges with Historic Whaling and Trading Partners -$8.8M (eliminated)

  • National Writing Project -$25.6M (eliminated)

  • Reading is Fundamental -$24.8M (eliminated)

  • Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program -$7.5M (eliminated)

  • State Assessments  -$20M

  • Comprehensive Centers  -$5M

  • Teacher Quality State Grants -$5M (earmark for New Leaders for New Schools)

  • National Board for Professional Teaching Standards -$10.6M (eliminated)

  • Close-up Fellowships  -$1.9M (eliminated)

  • Teach for America -$18M (eliminated)

  • Teaching of Traditional American History -$73M

  • Grants to gulf coast states' LEAs  -$12M (eliminated)
  • Safe and Drug-Free Schools National Programs -$97M

  • English Language Acquisition State Grants  -$15M

  • Special Olympics  -$8.1M (eliminated)

  • Recordings for the Blind  -$13.3M

  • FIE projects (Earmarks)  -$88M

  • Smaller Learning Communities  -$88M (eliminated)

  • Training for Incarcerated Individuals  -$17.2M (eliminated)

  • LEAP  -$63.9M (eliminated)
  • Federal Supplemental Education Opportunity Grants -$20M
  • 
TRIO -$25M

  • GEAR UP -$20M

  • Byrd scholarships -$42M (eliminated)

  • Strengthening Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Serving Institutions  -$15.1M (eliminated)

  • Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Vocational Institutions -$8.2M (eliminated)

  • Higher Education Demonstration Projects for Persons with Disabilities -$6.8M (eliminated)

  • Thurgood Marshall Legal Scholarships -$3M (eliminated)

  • B.J. Stupak Olympic Scholarship  -$1M (eliminated)

  • Underground Railroad program -$1.9M (eliminated)

  • B.A. and Master’s STEM Foreign Language Teacher Training -$2.2M (eliminated)

  • Javits Fellowships -$1.6M

  • FIPSE -$101.5M (earmarks)

  • Emma Byrd Scholarships -$1.5M (eliminated)

  • Regional Education Labs -$13M



There will be a new one percent competitive set-aside ($29.4M) within the Teacher Quality State Grants program so groups such as Teach for America, National Writing Project and the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards will be eligible to compete for funding after their earmark funding was eliminated.

The section on the DC voucher program starts on page 425. 

 
The Pell maximum award is maintained at $5,550 and $23.002B is appropriated. For Pell its assumptions are:
  • Limit Pell grants to six years (12 semesters)

  • Eliminate College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 [CCRAA] provisions, such as the expansions of the level at which a student qualifies for an automatic zero '”Expected Family Contribution” [EFC] and the income protection allowance
  • Eliminate administrative fees paid to participating institutions
  • Consider a maximum income cap
  • Eliminate eligibility for less-than-half-time students
  • Terminate eligibility for those who currently receive the minimum award
  • Lower the maximum award (apparently to pre-ARRA levels)



However, according to a CBO analysis of HR 1473, in the end only $352M was in deficit reduction in this budget deal. Is it always smoke and mirrors? “About $8B in immediate cuts to domestic programs and foreign aid are offset by nearly equal increases in defense spending, and when war funding is factored in, the deal actually increases spending by $3.3B. The numbers show how hard it is to reduce the deficit quickly, even when both sides say it is their goal” (Washington Post).


Frederick (Fritz) S. Edelstein, Ph.D. is a principal in Public Private Action, LLC. Fritz works with clients on strategic government and constituent relations, advocacy research and policy analysis, strategic planning and resource development, and advocacy, outreach, and public engagement. He writes and disseminates “Fritzwire,” the nation’s leading Internet newsletter on education that provides timely education and related information, five days a week. His career includes time working at the U.S. Conference of Mayors, U.S. Department of Education, and the National Alliance of Business. Fritz earned is B.A. from Washington University, and a M.Ed. and Ph.D. from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Share this Page


Subscribe to CP&M E-News

College Planning & Management's free email newsletter keeping you up-to-date and informed.

I agree to this sites Privacy Policy.