FM and Sustainability
Sustainability is not a new concept, although the word did
not become part of the common lexicon until the last decade. The seed for its
underlying meaning was probably planted some 50 years ago, when Rachel Carson
came out with her book Silent Spring. I remember reading
the book when it first hit the shelves. Like many other readers, I became
interested in the environment.
- taking a train
through Michigan and seeing the ground concealed by a thick, yellow fog;
- the news relating
how our waterways and lakes were so badly polluted that one could develop
photographs in the muck; and
- my own valley, on
cold days, could have so much black airborne “yuck” that we could not see
buildings only a mile away.
Sadly, like many other people, I determined that this is our
collective problem… that someone else would need to resolve.
The first oil embargo impacted the U.S. in 1973. We agreed
that we had to become less dependent on foreign oil. (So far, we have failed
miserably at achieving that objective!) Energy became more expensive, and we
started to implement programs that were intended to save money. Energy
conservation shysters that mysteriously appeared duped some of us. Others among
us were actually fairly successful at conserving energy. Still, the motivation
was based entirely on dollars, while not giving much thought to the
Legislation such as the Clean Air Act (which dates back to
1970) was a well-kept secret. First passed in 1948, the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, popularly known as the Clean Water Act, has been amended
frequently since its initial passage. Yet, most of us in the FM business knew
little or nothing about these acts. Once they were imposed on us, we looked at
them as a burden; they were unfunded mandates that deserved to be indefinitely
In 1979 the National Science Foundation published a
research-based report that for the first time publicly expressed concern about
global warming. Yet it was only in the 1980s that the first organized efforts
addressing the environment started to evolve, however slowly. The people who
talked about it openly were called “tree-huggers,” and considered a little
weird. Facility managers, for the most part, pooh-poohed the movement. Even as
the word “sustainability” became more widely used, facilities managers
continued to insist on doing business as we had before, with the exception of
continuing to look for ways to conserve energy.
Today, while lay people and “experts” continue to argue
about the reality of global warming, most of us now agree that we need to do
more to sustain the environment. Arguably, most of us also support the notion
that we need to do more to improve the environment. Remarkably, some of us in
the FM business still continue to resist sustainable design and O&M. This
reluctance is usually justified by the perception that it is too expensive.
Not all that long ago, that belief was sustained by a lot of
truth. The process of designing and constructing a building that could meet the
bottom level of LEED certification added a substantial premium to the project
cost. We also found that operating and maintaining such facilities frequently
required an increase in resources.
Today’s reality is that, with encouragement from
organizations such as the IGCC (International Green Construction Code), USGBC
(U.S. Green Building Council) with LEED, similar programs in Canada and Europe
and China, and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), producers and
manufacturers of “green” products have become much more aware of the global
competition for their products. Prices have come down to where they frequently
cost no more, and sometimes less, than their traditional counterparts.
The costs for designing and construction of sustainable
buildings have also come under control. The more conscientious (and
competitive) designers/constructors have become better educated regarding
sustainable design. They have staffed their offices with people who understand
and are enthusiastic about sustainability. Thus, they are more able and willing
to minimize additional costs for “green” design.
Now it is up to us. We must face the fact that we are going
to be maintaining buildings and systems that are frequently much different from
the ones we built even as little as 10 years ago. We must adapt to new products
and processes that will enable us to sustain these new buildings, or else they
will be more expensive.
Note: Some of the details mentioned in this article were
extracted from The Facility Management Handbook, Third Edition; Cotts, Roper,
Payant; Amacom, 2010.
Pete van der Have is a retired facilities management
professional and is currently teaching university-level FM classes as well as
doing independent consulting. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.